Are you harvesting and/or selling the user data you collect for this app?

I improved one of my boardgames with 48 unique 3d printed spaceship designs

What the hell are you talking about, Jesse?

I don’t think they care about monetizing the output, but only about not being sued by the output and making other need to pay 1B to Disney before releasing models. Basically they run out of moat, and now they’re creating an artifical moat.

I really don’t understand gardening. I see gardeners agonize about soil structure, acidity and so on, and taking so much care and things still don’t grow. But just randomly throw these balls and they’ll be ok?

The inevitable follow-up of their OpenAI deal. Make a deal with a big GenAI company to get precedent for them licensing your copyrights, then go against everyone else who doesn’t have such a deal. Now it’s up to see who bribed Trump the most.

Daym, Tool as the trailer music was kinda cool

Dude, what? Are you sure you’re in the right instance? Purges? Fuck outta here

It’s a classic move by an established party. Use your momentum to add increased costs for compliance, increasing the entry costs and making it impossible for smaller and freer players to compete. It’s away of pulling the ladder behind them. Openai didn’t have to pay this, until they got big enough to have the money for it. Now everyone else will be expected to do so as well no matter how small they are.

Ugh. Well, good luck if you try to engage in such a bad-faith space.

I found subtitles for it iirc

You sound cool and seem to have enough patience to counter ML-propaganda. Hope you stick around :)

Disengage. FFS! Take a hint.

Kropotkin and Lucy Parsons would disagree

Stop bringing up your pet anarchists. We’re not reliant on the words of “Great people” like Marxists are. Even Stalin and Trotsky couldn’t even fucking agree like that and they were using the words of Lenin directly. Give it a rest.

Not gonna enable your debate-perverty, mate. You clearly can’t (or won’t) tell when people are not in the mood to engage with you and are likely just seeing it as an opportunity to propagandize the audience for ML.

Given that anarchists consider USSR and PRC and the rest as merely forms of State Capitalism, the red fash description is very much apt, even if one accepts the ML definition of fascism (which we don’t have to).

Yes, you keep saying your piece. Sorry not sorry that I keep calling the fash, fash.

As is tradition. Although it was partially recycled.

We’re not against marxism in general, but more against the red fash versions of it. I’ll leave the comm owner to elaborate why they felt this instance was the right fit for this comm. I’m also not going to make a “left-unity” comm just to allow dictator-stans unchallenged propaganda platforms.

I’m not going to reach in and control this comm, but as an anarchist instance, there’s only so much open “critical support” for red fash we can tolerate. If this becomes too common, we might have to have a serious discussion about tolerating pro-authoritarian propaganda as an instance.

Wtf is this Stalin praise shit in here. He Also killed anarchists, communists, and every other dissenter.